Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) – Ceramic Filters
- What are ceramic filters and how do they differ from standard LC and distributed filters?
- Where are ceramic filters most effective?
- Why does the surface-mount footprint show the ground plane missing underneath the filters?
- Why does the footprint drawing show vias underneath the part if the part replaces the ground plane?
- What determines a filter’s insertion loss?
- What determines a filter’s rejection?
- Can I get 60dB or greater rejection from a ceramic filter?
- How do ceramic filters act under extreme environmental conditions?
- Are ceramic filters temperature sensitive?
- What kinds of filters can be made from ceramics?
- I’ve noticed the silver peeling off of filters I’ve used in the past. What causes this? Is it some thing I am doing wrong?
- What are typical failure modes of ceramic filters?
- I am currently using a cavity filter, it’s big and expensive, can it be replaced by a ceramic filter?
- Can Diplexers/Duplexers be made with ceramic filters?
- How much power can a ceramic filter handle?
- How high of a reflow temperature can ceramic filters withstand?
- Why do I not get the same response as the test data that came with the filters?
- How does cleaning affect ComNav parts?
Glossary of Terms
Solder Re-flow Specifications
What are ceramic filters and how do they differ from standard LC and distributed filters?
Ceramic filters can be either of coaxial form or dielectrically loaded waveguide. Ceramic filters as discussed here are TEM coaxial structures using quarter wave resonators and either capacitive or magnetic coupling. The quarter wave resonator is formed from a block (usually square) of ceramic material with a hole in the middle parallel to it’s length. The outside, one end, and the hole are coated with a conductive material (usually silver) to form a shorted quarter wave length of transmission line. The length -vs- frequency of the line is determined by the dielectric constant of the ceramic. Essentially, ceramic filters are a form of distributed filters. They are much more rugged than LC filters which are susceptible to vibration and microphonics. Ceramic filters are much less expensive to produce than either LC or cavity type filters, due to the reduced labor, material, and machining costs. In addition, most modern ceramic materials are extremely temperature stable with temp coefficients of < 5ppm. Typically ceramic filters are much less temperature sensitive than either LC or Cavity filters, even after compensation.
Back to Top
Where are ceramic filters most effective?
Coaxial ceramic filters fit within the frequency range of about 500 MHz to 6000 MHz. This broad range is accomplished by using ceramic material of various dielectric constants to optimize the size of the resonators. With magnetic coupled filters, bandwidth is limited to about 8%, but magnetic coupling allows broad and deep stopbands, with 80 dB or more to 6 GHz not uncommon. Capacitively coupled filters can achieve bandwidths of 20% or more, but the stopband attenuation is limited to about 40 dB due to parasitic coupling at the front of the resonator. This problem becomes more pronounced with smaller resonators and higher frequencies.
Back to Top
Why does the surface-mount footprint show the ground plane missing underneath the filters?
Our standard footprint has only the outside ground radii connected. What our customers have found is that the most consistent connection method has the filter ground replace the board ground plane. This has the advantage of having inspectable solder joints along the edge of the part, and eliminating common ground-looping problems caused by inconsistent connection in the large area underneath the part.
There are cases where we recommend soldering the underneath of the part. The first case is when the filter is installed on a multi-layer board with a ground plane beneath it. Unless care is taken to avoid it, it is possible that the pads will suffer poor isolation because of waveguiding beneath the part.
The second is when very high levels of rejection (above 60 dB) mandate a very high-quality ground. In this case soldering the entire ground plane underneath the filter can improve the rejection performance. It is often helpful in these cases to add a ground connection from the board to the top of the filter jacket. When a shield is installed, care must be taken to avoid tuned regions of the filter. If you need further assistance in this case, please contact us.
Back to Top
Why does the footprint drawing show vias underneath the part if the part replaces the ground plane?
The drawing shows our part overlayed on the footprint, the vias you see are actually the ones on the filter’s carrier board.
Back to Top
What determines a filter’s insertion loss?
A filter’s insertion loss is determined by the unloaded Q of the resonator, the bandwidth of the filter, and the number of resonators. Bandwidth and number of resonators are usually determined at the system level, and are given for a specific filter. This leaves unloaded Q as the primary loss determination between one filter type or another. On ceramic filters Q is comprised of a dielectric component (Qd) and a conductive component (Qc). The resultant total Q (Qt) is calculated as 1/Qt = 1/Qd + 1/Qc. Qd is the loss of the ceramic material itself and is typically in the 10’s of thousands. However, there are some materials that are lossy but provide a required dielectric constant to achieve a certain frequency range. Qc is solely determined by the coating on the outside of the ceramic. This is typically in the 100’s, therefore the process of coating the ceramic will be the primary determining factor of filter loss. At ComNav, have developed a proprietary coating process which we do in-house. This process has consistently proven to yield about 30% higher Q than any other competitive parts measured.
Back to Top
What determines a filter’s rejection?
The rejection or attenuation a filter can achieve is determined by the number of resonators, how the resonators are connected, and the quality of the ground of the circuit in which the filter is used. As mentioned previously, magnetic coupled filters can achieve extremely high levels of attenuation if grounded properly. To assist in this grounding ComNav has developed a thru-hole mount package that provides superior and consistent performance in the end circuit. By grounding along the length of the filter, and connecting to the filter on the opposite side of the board, additional shielding and reduced leakage is achieved. This is accomplished in a open lead frame package at frequencies in the 3GHz and higher range. In addition to grounding ComNav has also developed proprietary pole/zero and cross-coupled circuit typologies which optimize the stopband by placing attenuation where it is needed. This reduces the number of resonators required and further reduces the insertion loss.
Back to Top
Can I get 60 dB or greater rejection from a ceramic filter?
Yes. Magnetic coupled filters are not susceptible to the parasitic capacitance between the resonators that affect the performance of capacitively coupled filters. Even in leadless SMT packages with proper grounding we have consistently been able to achieve 70-80 dB rejection specs. However, careful attention should be given to grounding.
Back to Top
How do ceramic filters act under extreme environmental conditions?
Ceramic filters are basically painted rocks. The size and shaped of the rocks determine the filter’s performance. Due to this rugged construction, the filter is not sensitive to shock, vibration, temperature, or humidity. The only environmental effect that can distort a filter is condensing humidity on some types of designs. This is a temporary effect, after the filter dries out it will come right back into spec with no long term damage. Once a filter is tuned to spec, short of hitting it with a sledge hammer, it is virtually indestructible.
Back to Top
Are ceramic filters temperature sensitive?
The temperature performance of ceramic filters is determined mostly by the ceramic material itself, and to a lessor extent the coupling, loading and other external components. Over the years, we have worked with our ceramic suppliers and have developed materials with the lowest possible temperature coefficient that is a compromise across our various construction techniques. The worst material we use has a temperature coefficient of 5ppm. At 5 GHz this translates into a temp drift of 1.5 MHz across our standard temp range of -40C to +85C. Most of the materials we use have temp coefficients of 1 ppm or less. This reduced temperature drift means that we can squeeze additional performance out of the filter. Since we do not have to compensate for significant temperature drift we can design closer to the spec.
Back to Top
What kinds of filters can be made from ceramics?
Most ceramic filters are narrowband bandpass filters. But bandstop filters also lend themselves nicely to ceramic construction. Since ceramic resonators are basically narrowband devices, they do not lend themselves well to broadband lowpass or highpass filters. These devices are much better suited to LC or printed structures.
Back to Top
I’ve noticed the silver peeling off of filters I’ve used in the past. What causes this? Is it some thing I am doing wrong?
The problem you are asking about is silver adhesion. Adhesion is a big problem with ceramic filters. The coating process is a very delicate operation. The slightest process variation, and the first thing to go is adhesion. This also affects the unloaded Q of the resonator. Most ceramic resonators, including ComNav’s, use a thick-film silver sintering process to coat the resonators. We were lucky in that we had three years of pure R&D time to develop and refine our process and discover what can go wrong. Whether we use outside vendors or our own in-house process, we know immediately when something goes wrong and we fix it. As a result, over the last couple of years we have refined our process and assisted our outside vendors to improve their process to the point where we can no longer measure adhesion (either the ceramic or the pull tester breaks).
To answer your second question, no you are not doing anything wrong, and most likely your filter supplier didn’t either, as the problem started before they even received the resonators. A properly coated resonator is impervious to soldering temperatures, fluxes, and normal bench handling. However, an improperly coated resonator can peel, have silver leach off during soldering, or degrade over time if humidity can get under the silver and pull the silver away. At ComNav, we qualify every batch of resonators before they go into production with sampled Q and pull tests.
Back to Top
What are typical failure modes of ceramic filters?
Over the years, we have come upon 3 distinct failure modes that can be induced by customers, one temporary, and two fatal modes. I will not go into bad coating problems since I consider that to be our problem, not yours. The temporary mode was mentioned previously, which is condensing moisture. Some construction techniques use a pin and bushing assembly to perform the impedance matching in and out of the filter. Electrically this makes up a loading capacitor. When moisture in the form of droplets get in the loading capacitor it will change the capacitance and distort the filter’s tuning. However, once it dries out it will be back to its original tuning. The fatal modes are silver bubbling, and chipping. Silver bubbling occurs when the filter mounted on a PC board is cleaned with an ultrasonic cleaner. The silver coating is bonded to the ceramic with a glass frit. The molecular vibration of the ultrasonic cleaner more than 5 minutes is strong enough to break the glass frit under the silver. Eventually the silver will bubble, a small hole will appear, water vapor gets in, and over time shrinks and expands and pushes the silver away from the ceramic. The worst thing about this problem is that it is a time bomb. It can take years to develop and when it does, can destroy the filter, and vastly degrade the performance of the system with a problem almost impossible to troubleshoot. Our recommendation: never, under any circumstances, use ultrasonic cleaners on boards with ceramic filters or any thick film component (including resistors). The third failure mode is obvious but I’ll mention it anyway, that of chipping. Ceramic along with it’s thick film coating are very brittle. If dropped on a hard surface it can chip just like a ceramic ash tray or figurine. This will distort the tuning of the filter.
Back to Top
I am currently using a cavity filter, it’s big and expensive, can it be replaced by a ceramic filter?
In some cases, yes. Ceramic filters can achieve unloaded Q’s of 1000 or more in 12 profile resonators. So the insertion loss and stopband performance are relatively close between cavity and ceramic typologies. There have been numerous instances where our customers have replaced machined cavity filters with ceramics. In some cases not only is there a size and price advantage, but also a performance advantage. By using cross coupling and pole/zero circuits we have been able to achieve similar or even better performance with fewer resonators. There will always be a trade-off because nothing is for free. Usually it boils down to the question of whether that 0.5 dB less of insertion loss is really worth an extra $200 to $400 per filter, which is usually the price difference between a cavity and ceramic filter.
Back to Top
Can Diplexers/Duplexers be made with ceramic filters?
Ceramic filters lend themselves very well to diplexing. The high impedance inputs can be prototyped to provide both contiguous and non-contiguous crossovers with a full match on the opposite or output end of the filters. Bandpass/bandpass diplexers are most common, but bandpass/notch diplexers also work well. Notch/Notch diplexers, classically called duplexers, are a little more difficult and in some frequency ranges are not practical. But we have built them for several of the standard communications bands.
Back to Top
How much power can a ceramic filter handle?
Since ceramic filters for the most part are relatively low impedance, arcing from high voltages is generally not a problem. The main limiting factor will be how hot can the part get before damage occurs. With this in mind, the filter’s insertion loss will be a prime determinant of power handling and will determine the temperature rise caused by the dissipated power. There can in fact be instances were a small 4 mm leadless SMT filter can handle more power than a thru-hole mount 12 mm filter. It will all depend on loss, bandwidth, heatsinking, duty cycle and will be different for each device. I use a general rule of thumb, that a 4mm filter can handle 2 watts, 6 mm 5 watts, and a 12 mm filter can handle 20 watts. But each type will probably handle more depending on the circumstances. Generally a thru-hole package, grounded to a good heat sink can double the power handling ability given in rule of thumbs.
Back to Top
How high of a reflow temperature can ceramic filters withstand?
The main limiting factor in reflow is not the ceramic, but the carrier board, and soldering of internal components. Our internal construction uses SN-95 or SN10 solder depending on the filter type. The carrier or insulating board will initially discolor, then delaminate, then boil, when exposed to excessive temperature. As limits, we recommend not exceeding the following time/temps: 215C/60 sec, 230C/30 sec, 245C/15sec, 260C/10sec.
Back to Top
Why do I not get the same response as the test data that came with the filters?
This is a common problem that occurs with pretty much all SMT filters, ours and everyone else’s. We had to standardize our I/O pads at some dimension in order to somewhat standardize our product and keep our costs down. Our standard pad width is 0.058″, which is 50 ohms for 30 mil thick FR4. The problem is just about every one of our customers use a different board material with different 50 ohm line dimensions. If there is an over hang of the filter pad relative to your trace, this will result in a parasitic shunt capacitor at the input and output of the filter. This parasitic shunt cap will cause a mismatch and distort the filter’s performance. Our recommendation in this situation is to attach a 5-12 nh coil in a shunt configuration off of the input and output of the filter. By adding a shunt coil, it is possible to resonate this cap and effectively remove its effect. We suggest getting an engineering kit of CoilCraft microsprings (http://www.coilcraft.com/smspring.cfm) and try different values until the best value is found. This technique usually solves the problem and our customers have done this and have had great success.
Back to Top
How does cleaning affect ComNav parts?
ComNav parts are made to withstand very diverse environments while in the field. ComNav parts with open-frame covers (typically ending in –L or –LX) should always be hand-cleaned. Cleaning using high pressure jets or immersion cleaning are NOT recommended for these parts as the force of the jets can damage wires. High pressure jets and immersion cleaning can also damage potting material. NOTICE: Use of high pressure jet cleaning or immersion cleaning voids the warranty on open frame parts.
Back to Top
Glossary of Terms
To alleviate the inevitable confusion that occurs when engineers from different backgrounds and countries communicate, this glossary of terms is provided to define what ComNav means when discussing certain specifications.
Amplitude Flatness – Defined in dB, this term means the total amplitude variation across a given frequency passband. This value includes roll-off associated with finite unloaded Q.
Amplitude Ripple – Defined in dB, this value refers only to the signal variation caused by the VSWR and does not include the roll-off associated with finite unloaded Q.
Absolute Attenuation – Defined as dBa, this term describes the absolute attenuation at a given frequency.
Bandwidth – Unless specifically stated otherwise, our filters are specified according to the 3dB or half-power bandwidth.
Group Delay Variation – Defined as a unit of time, typically nano-sec.
Linear – This is defined by the difference in the end points of the group delay curve.
Parabolic – The total variation of the group delay from a flat line, usually expressed as a +/- value.
Insertion Loss – Defined in dB, this term describes the attenuation or loss at the reference point of the filter, usually the center frequency.
Phase Linearity – Defined in degrees, this term describes the total phase variation from a straight line across a given frequency band, usually expressed as a +/- value.
Passband Loss – Defined in dB, this term describes the absolute loss across a band of frequencies the filter is supposed to pass.
Rejection – Defined as dBc, this term describes the attenuation at a given frequency relative to the lowest loss point on the filter, usually the filter’s center frequency.
VSWR – Defined as a ratio, this term describes the reflection coefficient of the filter and can be associated with a frequency passband; but, it is usually described as typical which is some percentage of the filter’s 3 dB passband, which depends mostly on the number of resonators.
Back to Top
We Welcome Questions and Suggestions!